Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Responses to Objectivism: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 00:31, 21 June 2006

Revision as of 00:36, 21 June 2006

Line 114:

*'''Keep'''. Same reasons as Crazynas and Goethean. --[[User:GreedyCapitalist|GreedyCapitalist]] 22:04, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

*'''Delete'''. While, depending on the fate of the [[Objectivism (Ayn Rand)]] article, some of this information may need to be separated, it is inappropriate to remove all criticism from any article, particularly when the criticism is indisputably relevant to the topic of the article. ^{[[User:Ig0774|iggy]]}_{[[User_talk:Ig0774|talk]]} 22:08, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

**'''Comment''' note that the intention is not to remove all comments on Objectivism from the main article, it is to appropratlyappropriately summerizesummarize it down. [[User:Crazynas|Crazynas]] 00:20, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

***Considering all the hostility from the Randists, there's no way we can "appropriately" summed it up. Randists are too quick to delete anything that goes against the cult's views, and claim things are "POV" or "unsourced" even when presented with sources. To reduce the section would only make it easier for such biased editing to happen. A summary is more likely to be attacked by Randists under the same accusations. -- [[User talk:LGagnon|LGagnon]] 00:31, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

***I don't think that having the responses (note that there are both positive and negative responses in this article) dominate [[Objectivism (Ayn Rand)|O]] is the way to go. [[User:Crazynas|Crazynas]] 00:36, 21 June 2006 (UTC)