Talk:SpaceX reusable launch system development program/GA1: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Jamesx12345 (talk | contribs) r |
Jamesx12345 (talk | contribs) + |
||
Line 15:
**I would tend to agree, but what is there is a result of somewhat involved Talk page consensus; moreover, the original source only gives the velocities in Mach numbers, which are approximate, and so we felt we ought to leave those Mach nos. in the encyclopedia prose. And generally, in spaceflight related articles, we give velocities in both SI units and in English measurment units for a global audience. Do you think the GA criteria would trump the Talk page consensus? I would be happy to revisit the topic with the previous discussants. [[User:N2e|N2e]] ([[User talk:N2e|talk]]) 01:25, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
***If there is a local consensus to have it one way, I see no problem with that. [[User:Jamesx12345|James]]<sup>x</sup>[[User talk:Jamesx12345|12345]] 21:42, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
*"It said this was an approximation." - this single sentence looks a bit odd. It also makes the use of refs 6 and 7 a bit unclear.
*I've tagged 4 dead links using Checklinks. There's also a {{cn}} needing fixed, but that might be covered by ref 46.
| |||