Revision as of 22:40, 28 February 2014 edit N2e (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 56,726 edits →GA Review: fixed a couple more items; have also started work on the deadlinks ← Previous edit		Revision as of 22:43, 28 February 2014 edit undo Jamesx12345 (talk \| contribs) Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 28,014 edits + Next edit →
Line 34: "for March 2014 at the earliest." - another ref needed. I'll stop referring to refs by number since they might change unpredictably as you add or move them. [[Transonic]] can be linked. There is inconsistent use of full stops in '''Technology.''' I think it's just 3 that are needed. "and upon introducing space launch customers to the idea of putting a payload in space with a used stage" - quite colloquial "and upon space launch customers being willing to put a payload in space with a used stage" is a bit clearer, maybe. *"If all aspects of the test program go very well, and if a customer is interested, SpaceX said in September 2013 that the first reflight of a Falcon 9 booster stage could be done in late 2014." - "in September 2013, SpaceX said that if all aspects of the test program are successful and a customer is interested, the first reflight of a Falcon 9 booster stage could be done in late 2014."

Talk:SpaceX reusable launch system development program/GA1: Difference between revisions