Revision as of 21:14, 28 January 2014 edit Widefox (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 110,632 edits proj / rate ← Previous edit		Revision as of 21:34, 4 March 2014 edit undo 70.167.172.2 (talk) No edit summary Next edit →
Line 298: From your friendly hard working bot.—[[User:Cyberbot II\|<span style="color:green;font-family:Neuropol">cyberbot II]] [[User talk:Cyberbot II\|<sup style="color:green;font-family:arnprior">Notify]]<sub style="margin-left:-6.1ex;color:green;font-family:arnprior">Online</sub> 18:33, 8 December 2013 (UTC) == Self-contradictory Information in Summary and Body == The opening summary states that Java performance is "not much different" from C++ citing a [http://blog.cfelde.com/2010/06/c-vs-java-performance/ blog article] which claims that "it's a tie." The body of the article states that Java micro-benchmark "performance is generally slower than or similar to compiled languages such as C or C++," referencing the [http://benchmarksgame.alioth.debian.org/u64q/java.php Computer Language Benchmarks Game]. The latter is a weaker and, in my opinion after reviewing both sources, probably the more accurate claim. I recommend making the claims in both sections consistent with one another. Thoughts? 21:31, 4 Mar 2013 (UTC)

Talk:Java performance: Difference between revisions