Brouwer fixed-point theorem: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 13:
Suppose ''f''&nbsp;:&nbsp;''D''<sup>&nbsp;''n''</sup>&nbsp;<tt>-></tt>&nbsp;''D''<sup>&nbsp;''n''</sup> is a continuous function that has no fixed point. The idea is to show that this leads to a contradiction. For each ''x'' in ''D''<sup>&nbsp;''n''</sup>, consider the straight line that passes through ''f''(''x'') and ''x''. There is only one such line, because ''f''(''x'') &ne; ''x''. Following this line from ''f''(''x'') through ''x'' leads to a point on ''S''<sup>&nbsp;''n''<tt>-</tt>1</sup>. Call this point ''g''(''x''). This gives us a continuous function ''g''&nbsp;:&nbsp;''D''<sup>&nbsp;''n''</sup>&nbsp;<tt>-></tt>&nbsp;''S''<sup>&nbsp;''n''<tt>-</tt>1</sup>. This is a special type of continuous function known as a retraction: every point of the [[codomain]] (in this case ''S''<sup>&nbsp;''n''<tt>-</tt>1</sup>) is a fixed point of the function. Intuitively it seems unlikely that there could be a retraction of ''D''<sup>&nbsp;''n''</sup> onto ''S''<sup>&nbsp;''n''<tt>-</tt>1</sup>, and in the case ''n'' = 1 it is obviously impossible because ''S''<sup>&nbsp;0</sup> isn't even connected. For ''n'' > 1, however, proving the impossibility of the retraction is considerably more difficult. One way is to make use of [[homology group|homology groups]]: it can be shown that ''H''<sub>''n''<tt>-</tt>1</sub>(''D''<sup>&nbsp;''n''</sup>) is trivial while ''H''<sub>''n''<tt>-</tt>1</sub>(''S''<sup>&nbsp;''n''<tt>-</tt>1</sup>) is infinite [[cyclic group|cyclic]]. This shows that the retraction is impossible, because a retraction cannot increase the size of homology groups.
 
There is also an almost elementary [[combinatorial proof]]. Its main step consists in establishing [[Sperner's lemma]] in ''n'' dimensions.
 
== Generalizations ==