Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snap (web framework): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
EdJohnston (talk | contribs) →Snap (web framework): Keep |
Another vote for Keep, with justification |
||
Line 19:
*'''Keep''', nice amount of source coverage. — '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 17:28, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' – Though the article could be better, the topic appears notable. This is one of the main web frameworks that have been coded in [[Haskell (programming language)|Haskell]]. We already have articles on [[Yesod (web framework)]] and [[Happstack]]. Yesod is probably in the lead since it is covered by [http://shop.oreilly.com/product/0636920023142.do an O'Reilly book], but the other two appear serious as well. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 01:50, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
* '''Keep:''' The non-notability claim is clearly refuted by references to a published book, an IEEE journal article, and numerous web articles. In fact, it's hard to imagine how this page could have ever been considered for deletion. But I think it was just an honest mistake - apparently the quality of the article was previously very low. There is nothing like the threat of deletion to inspire editors to clean up a badly written article. [[User:StormWillLaugh|StormWillLaugh]] ([[User talk:StormWillLaugh|talk]]) 14:09, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
| |||