Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snap (web framework): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Snap (web framework): Added reference to Snap book. |
→Snap (web framework): now looks like a Keep |
||
Line 21:
* '''Keep:''' The non-notability claim is clearly refuted by references to a published book, an IEEE journal article, and numerous web articles. In fact, it's hard to imagine how this page could have ever been considered for deletion. But I think it was just an honest mistake - apparently the quality of the article was previously very low. There is nothing like the threat of deletion to inspire editors to clean up a badly written article. [[User:StormWillLaugh|StormWillLaugh]] ([[User talk:StormWillLaugh|talk]]) 14:09, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
:Oh, the book was only mentioned here, it wasn't referenced in the article. OK, added reference. [[User:StormWillLaugh|StormWillLaugh]] ([[User talk:StormWillLaugh|talk]]) 16:29, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
* '''Comment''' Thanks to those who have contributed to this discussion. In view of the extra information that's been given here and added to the article, I'm happy to let the article go to what looks like an overwhelming '''keep'''. However, I do think it needs some improvement, as it still comes across as rather promotional in the "Overview" section; and there are a lot of inline external links that should be changed to references, per point 2 of [[Wikipedia:EXTLINK#Important_points_to_remember]]. [[User:AndrewWTaylor|AndrewWTaylor]] ([[User talk:AndrewWTaylor|talk]]) 16:43, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
| |||