Content deleted Content added
TakuyaMurata (talk | contribs) m →top |
TakuyaMurata (talk | contribs) m →Proof |
||
Line 12:
Then we have:
:<math>(d f_a)_e = d(h \circ (x \mapsto (x^{-1}, a, \sigma(x))))_e = dh_{(e, a, e)} \circ (-1, 0, d\sigma_e) = -1 + d \sigma_e</math>
where <math>h(x, y, z) = xyz</math>. It follows <math>(d f_a)_e</math> is bijective since the differential of the Frobenius <math>\sigma</math> vanishes. Since <math>f_a(bx) = f_{f_a(b)}(x)</math>, we also see that <math>(df_a)_b</math> is bijective for any ''b''. Let ''X'' be the closure of the image of <math>f_1</math>.
== See also ==
|