Talk:SpaceX reusable launch system development program/GA1: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Jamesx12345 (talk | contribs) r |
cmt |
||
Line 24:
***The WPO article is based on this video by AP [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RkvLQdzZRFo] - I think that might be a better ref. [[Template:Cite AV media]] could be used for this purpose. [[User:Jamesx12345|James]]<sup>x</sup>[[User talk:Jamesx12345|12345]] 17:27, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
****Thanks. Unfortunately that link at the AP only has a couple minutes of the news conference on it. But I was able to locate another link, on the National Press Club archive. I've added that video link (as you suggested) to the NPC line to supplement the (very good, but now dead) WaPo article. [[User:N2e|N2e]] ([[User talk:N2e|talk]]) 18:47, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
*****I've just removed the link altogether. I think it's probably less confusing that way, and just as good as an unlinked ref to a paper source. [[User:Jamesx12345|James]]<sup>x</sup>[[User talk:Jamesx12345|12345]] 20:38, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
******That's a good solution. I wasn't sure what the standard is for that sort of thing (leave the link? take it out? what sort of note to leave? etc.) I'm very glad that you, as an experienced GA reviewer, knew what to do with that.
::::::In the meantime, I think I still have a couple more of the deadlinks to crawl through, and a few more "in process" items to work. [[User:N2e|N2e]] ([[User talk:N2e|talk]]) 21:36, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
*"first stage is now being flight tested" - very liable to dating. Given that you and some other editors have focused on this article for a fair length of time, it should be OK, but an {{tl|As of}} or {{tl|Update after}} could be used.
**{{Fixed}} — [[User:N2e|N2e]] ([[User talk:N2e|talk]]) 22:26, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
| |||