Revision as of 05:25, 13 October 2010 edit UncleDouggie (talk \| contribs) Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 7,718 edits m moved Talk:NISC to Talk:No instruction set computing: Consistency with spelling out article names for CISC, RISC, MISC, etc. ← Previous edit		Revision as of 12:50, 19 March 2014 edit undo Sofia Koutsouveli (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 815 edits →A little bit far too technical maybe: new section Next edit →
Line 6: :At a guess, flexibility and dynamicism? One is locked into the current instruction set, but one's compression techniques can change the encoding, make different tradeoffs, and do even more low-level JITing. --[[User talk:Gwern \|Gwern]] [[Special:Contributions/Gwern \| (contribs)]] 00:07 23 June 2010 (GMT) == A little bit far too technical maybe == The article needs some cleanup to make it more understandable to someone who isn't an engineer. Do you know any good books or other sources explaining the NISC technology? [[User:Sofia Koutsouveli\|Sofia Koutsouveli]] ([[User talk:Sofia Koutsouveli\|talk]]) 12:50, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Talk:No instruction set computing: Difference between revisions