Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Post-object programming: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
MartinSpamer (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
Line 8:
:I now think the article is nothing but academic propaganda for someone's non-notable research. --[[User:Euyyn|euyyn]] 01:35, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' or, failing that, '''Redirect to [[Aspect-oriented programming]]''' for now with leave to rewrite - according to [http://www.cse.unr.edu/~sushil/class/425/notes/p29-elrad.pdf] and [http://www.fit.ac.jp/~zhao/waosd2004/pdf/Zhang.pdf], [[Aspect-oriented programming|AOP]] is a subset of [[Post-object programming|POP]]. But the current [[Post-object programming|POP]] article really seems to just be describing [[Aspect-oriented programming|AOP]]. Still, the term is clearly notable, even if this article is incomplete. [[User:BigDT|BigDT]] 02:15, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
*'''delete''' - The content is mostly weak and the few things of note are well covered elsewhere. The implication that these things are post-OO is simply wrong; delegation, mixins and multiple dispatch are an intergral part of OO. I've only ever come across this as an expression used in a descriptive sense and it not deserving of it's own page. [[User:MartinSpamer|MartinSpamer]]
| |||