Revision as of 23:00, 26 March 2014 edit Foobarnix (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 14,615 edits remove invalid statement which states that Aronson's sequence is an autogram ← Previous edit		Revision as of 03:30, 27 March 2014 edit undo David Eppstein (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Administrators 235,850 edits Undid revision 601424947 by Foobarnix (talk) in what sense is this sentence untrue? Next edit →
Line 6: :1, 4, 11, 16, 24, 29, 33, ... {{OEIS\|A005224}}. Aronson's sequence is essentially an [[autogram]] that describes itself. {{harvtxt\|Cloitre\|Sloane\|Vandermast\|2003}} write that Aronson's sequence is "a classic example of a [[Self-reference\|self-referential]] sequence"; however, they criticize it for being ambiguously defined due to the variation in naming of numbers over one hundred in different dialects of English. In its place, they offer several other self-referential sequences whose definitions rely only on mathematics rather than on the English language.<ref>{{citation

Aronson's sequence: Difference between revisions