Content deleted Content added
→List of examples: new section |
m →binary requirement: Fix interwiki link(s) broken by removal of "wiki:" link prefix in January 2014 (see m:Talk:Interwiki map#Wiki). using AWB |
||
Line 78:
:It seems CIL is not in itself bytecode, but can be assembled into bytecode. So CIL itself is not a form of bytecode. The only "human readable bytecode" I can think of is one which just uses each letter of the alphabet were each letter stands for the mnemonic of one opcode, for example the letter 'G' (47Hex) for 'Goto'. That would be "readable", and would use one byte for each instruction. [[User:Mahjongg|Mahjongg]] ([[User talk:Mahjongg|talk]]) 11:57, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
:: Another human-readable bytecode: the original wiki mentions "sed scripts don't need to be tokenized; they already are ... All sed commands are one byte long, not including arguments. ... More languages than just sed have this property or a similar one." -- [[
== Old page history ==
| |||