Ring of symmetric functions: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
See also: Adding/removing wikilink(s)
fixed grammar mistake
Line 41:
Another construction of &Lambda;<sub>''R''</sub> takes somewhat longer to describe, but better indicates the relationship with the rings ''R''[''X''<sub>1</sub>,…,''X''<sub>''n''</sub>]<sup>'''S'''<sub>''n''</sub></sup> of symmetric polynomials in ''n'' indeterminates. For every ''n'' there is a surjective [[ring homomorphism]] &rho;<sub>''n''</sub> from the analoguous ring ''R''[''X''<sub>1</sub>,…,''X''<sub>''n''+1</sub>]<sup>'''S'''<sub>''n''+1</sub></sup> with one more indeterminate onto ''R''[''X''<sub>1</sub>,…,''X''<sub>''n''</sub>]<sup>'''S'''<sub>''n''</sub></sup>, defined by setting the last indeterminate ''X''<sub>''n''+1</sub> to&nbsp;0. Although &rho;<sub>''n''</sub> has a non-trivial kernel, the nonzero elements of that kernel have degree at least <math>n+1</math> (they are multiples of ''X''<sub>1</sub>''X''<sub>2</sub>&hellip;''X''<sub>''n''+1</sub>). This means that the restriction of &rho;<sub>''n''</sub> to elements of degree at most ''n'' is a bijective linear map, and &rho;<sub>''n''</sub>(''e''<sub>''k''</sub>(''X''<sub>1</sub>,…,''X''<sub>''n''+1</sub>))&nbsp;=&nbsp;''e''<sub>''k''</sub>(''X''<sub>1</sub>,…,''X''<sub>''n''</sub>) for all ''k''&nbsp;≤&nbsp;''n''. The inverse of this restriction can be extended uniquely to a ring homomorphism &phi;<sub>''n''</sub> from ''R''[''X''<sub>1</sub>,…,''X''<sub>''n''</sub>]<sup>'''S'''<sub>''n''</sub></sup> to ''R''[''X''<sub>1</sub>,…,''X''<sub>''n''+1</sub>]<sup>'''S'''<sub>''n''+1</sub></sup>, as follows for instance from the [[fundamental theorem of symmetric polynomials]]. Since the images &phi;<sub>''n''</sub>(''e''<sub>''k''</sub>(''X''<sub>1</sub>,…,''X''<sub>''n''</sub>))&nbsp;=&nbsp;''e''<sub>''k''</sub>(''X''<sub>1</sub>,…,''X''<sub>''n''+1</sub>) for ''k''&nbsp;=&nbsp;1,&hellip;,''n'' are still [[algebraically independent]] over&nbsp;''R'', the homomorphism &phi;<sub>''n''</sub> is injective and can be viewed as a (somewhat unusual) inclusion of rings. The ring &Lambda;<sub>''R''</sub> is then the "union" ([[direct limit]]) of all these rings subject to these inclusions. Since all &phi;<sub>''n''</sub> are compatible with the grading by total degree of the rings involved, &Lambda;<sub>''R''</sub> obtains the structure of a graded ring.
 
This construction differs slightly from the one in (Macdonald, 1979). That construction only uses the surjective morphisms &rho;<sub>''n''</sub> without mentioning the injective morphisms &phi;<sub>''n''</sub>: it constructs the homogeneous components of &Lambda;<sub>''R''</sub> separately, and equips their direct sum with a ring structure using the &rho;<sub>''n''</sub>. It is also observed that the result can be described as an [[inverse limit]] in the category of ''graded'' rings. That description however somewhat obscures an important property typical for a ''direct'' limit of injective morphisms, namely that every individual element (symmetric function) is already faithfully represented in some object used in the limit construction, here a ring ''R''[''X''<sub>1</sub>,…,''X''<sub>''d''</sub>]<sup>'''S'''<sub>''d''</sub></sup>. It suffices to take for ''d'' the degree of the symmetric function, since the part in degree ''d'' is of that ring is mapped isomorphically to rings with more indeterminates by &phi;<sub>''n''</sub> for all ''n''&nbsp;&ge;&nbsp;''d''. This implies that for studying relations between individual elements, there is no fundamental difference between symmetric polynomials and symmetric functions.
 
=== Defining individual symmetric functions ===