Talk:Rabin–Karp algorithm: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 01:07, 5 May 2014

Revision as of 20:02, 5 May 2014

Line 160:

{{requested move/dated|Karp–Rabin algorithm}}

[[:Rabin–Karp algorithm]] → {{no redirect|Karp–Rabin algorithm}} – There is no obvious reason for Rabin to be listed first. The author order on the original paper was Karp–Rabin (matching the usual alphabetical ordering convention for authors in this subject) and Google scholar has a somewhat larger number of hits for Karp–Rabin than for Rabin–Karp. —<small>'''Relisted'''. [[User:David EppsteinFavonian|David EppsteinFavonian]] ([[User talk:David EppsteinFavonian|talk]]) 2220:3102, 275 AprilMay 2014 (UTC)</small> —[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein|talk]]) 22:31, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

*'''Support''' With both forms in use, I'm fine defaulting to alphabetical order. --[[User:BDD|BDD]] ([[User talk:BDD|talk]]) 17:50, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

*'''Neutral'''. Either is good for me. Cormen uses RK, and RK sounds better KR (which may be why author order was switched -- leading with a double stop is awkward). [[User:Glrx|Glrx]] ([[User talk:Glrx|talk]]) 23:37, 29 April 2014 (UTC)