Discussione:Platone: differenze tra le versioni
Contenuto cancellato Contenuto aggiunto
Nessun oggetto della modifica |
|||
Riga 354:
{{q|Despite the terminology of ''eidos'' and ''idea'', which in later dialogues will serve '''to designate the Forms of classical Platonic theory''', the essences of the ''Euthyphro'' and ''Meno'' are not articulated as structures in the nature of things, neither as immanent nor as transcendent forms. In this situation the reader is free to assume either that the author of these dialogues has not yet decided on an ontological interpretation for his definienda, or that he has chosen to reserve this task for other dialogues, such as the ''Symposium'' and the ''Phaedo''. }}
:: Deve avere molti discepoli diffusi in tutto il mondo... :-D --[[Utente:Xinstalker|Xinstalker (心眼)]] ([[Discussioni utente:Xinstalker|msg]]) 18:20, 16 ago 2013 (CEST)
{{q|The centerpiece of Platonic philosophy is the metaphysicaltheory of Forms or Ideas, presented in three dialogues(Symposium, Phaedo, and Republic), utilized in two others(Cratylus and Phaedrus) and criticized in a sixth (Parmenides).Whether some version of this theory reappearsin dialogues later than the Parmenides is a question to bediscussed below. '''The term “idea” is a transliteration of idea, one of Plato’s terms for the Forms'''. Since the English word suggests something mental or psychological, “idea”seems misleading as a designation for Platonic Forms,which are clearly intended to be mind-independent realities.}}
| |||