Revision as of 20:22, 22 June 2006 edit Allan McInnes (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 4,932 edits →Rewrite on 2006-05-08: haskell-centric ← Previous edit		Revision as of 02:05, 28 June 2006 edit undo 203.59.86.86 (talk) →Rewrite on 2006-05-08 Next edit →
Line 85: Just to be clear, I don't have a problem with the use of Haskell as the language to illustrate monad concepts. But the current presentation is very much "here's how to use monads in Haskell". In particular, phrases like "To define a monad in Haskell...", and the disucssion of Haskell's do-notation seem more appropriate for a Haskell article than a general article on monads in FP. --[[User:Allan McInnes\|Allan McInnes]] <small>([[User talk:Allan McInnes\|talk]])</small> 20:22, 22 June 2006 (UTC) Unfortunately, I agree that if it's too abstract people won't actually be able to learn from it. For people coming from a CS rather than a maths background, Monads are rather tricky.

Talk:Monad (functional programming): Difference between revisions