Content deleted Content added
Re-wrote the whole thing. |
No edit summary |
||
Line 23:
I disagree with making the example x86, though. The x86 instruction set is horribly irregular and is a bad teaching tool, even if common. Most RISC architectures have a much simpler to understand instruction format. [[User:Morven|—Morven]] 20:06, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
== suggestion missing information ==
A variation to this topic: 'Polimorphic Opcode'
It is being mentioned (and explained a bit) here: [http://webmaster.iu.edu/perl56/pod/perlunicode.html#important%20caveat Perl Unicode caveat].
|