Content deleted Content added
m Signing comment by 68.183.37.167 - "→In Design Patterns/Code Complete - WTF: " |
|||
Line 231:
:Prior to the publication of GOF little was known on the subject. The authors wanted to provide a standard vocabulary for practitioners to communicate their thoughts and ideas. To begin the process they purposely chose "some of the most important design patterns and present them as a catalog."<ref>GOF page 2</ref> (I'm being informal because this is the talk page). By virtue of the number of copies sold and the acceptance by software engineers of these ideas, these book are the acknowledged references on the subject. – [[User:Rfrankla|rfrankla]] ([[User talk:Rfrankla|talk]]) 09:34, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
:: I agree - whether a pattern is in some book or another is completely irrelevant. It's like listing birds that are found in one particular field guide. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/68.183.37.167|68.183.37.167]] ([[User talk:68.183.37.167|talk]]) 14:32, 28 May 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
== Proactor ==
| |||