Content deleted Content added
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Damm algorithm closed as keep |
→totally anti-symmetric: new section |
||
Line 3:
==Contested PROD==
This article was proposed for deletion with rationale ''This article presents [[WP:OR|original research]], which is not permitted by our policies. Unless you can add [[WP:RS|reliable]] and independent [[WP:V|sources]], which attest to the subject's [[WP:N|notability]], your article will be deleted. Thank you for your understanding.'' This seems wrong and I have contested the PROD since the article does indeed cite reliable sources, namely a peer-reviewed academic journal, and our policy on [[WP:OR|original research]] is a prohibition on editors directly publishing their own unsupported work in an article -- it does not mean that we cannot report research published in independent reliable sources, which this appears to do. [[User:Deltahedron|Deltahedron]] ([[User talk:Deltahedron|talk]]) 07:33, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
== totally anti-symmetric ==
What does "totally anti-symmetric" mean in the context of this article?
What other wikipedia article talks about the kind of "anti-symmetric" and "totally anti-symmetric" alluded to here?
At first I thought maybe that phrase should link to [[antisymmetric matrix]],
but the table given in this article doesn't seem to meet the definition given in that article.
--[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] ([[User talk:DavidCary|talk]]) 17:29, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
| |||