Talk:Encoding/decoding model of communication: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 11:04, 19 November 2013

Revision as of 18:54, 10 June 2014

Line 16:

I agree with Lavoile's suggestion of linking this article from other articles. Another place where you could link Hall's theory is the Birmingham School of Cultural Studies page (which I have linked from your main page. I also suggest to move the section on Morley and Hebdige after the definition of the model. I agree with Ryan that the section on Hebdige needs more work, especially because Hebdige does not really deal with media audiences but rather with how the practical and symbolic function of daily objects such as safety pins and dog collars can be changed through subversive appropriations (Hebdige's book is mostly about the punk subculture). There are many other authors you could use here and that I suggested for you to look up in the Media Society reader. Please add references to these authors and read those texts. Also make sure to reference the original texts and not the readers. The readers should only function as index references for you to find those texts.[[User:Mdseriis|Mdseriis]] ([[User talk:Mdseriis|talk]]) 01:25, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

== A New Method to Encode and also to Decode an English words and also an English Sentence. ==

I have found a method to Encode and also to Decode an English word and also an English sentence. I named this study as Junction Codification. An English word is represented by two numbers and an English sentence is represented by four numbers.

To have a look of my work of codification then click on the below link.

https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0ByAVFG6uG9jnbHdxQzZTdGwxU3M&usp=sharing

Also have a look of this link given below.It gives the background for the study of junction codification.

https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0ByAVFG6uG9jnMzBQNXJBZUNqbTA&usp=sharing