Revision as of 03:11, 12 June 2014 edit Wthrower (talk \| contribs) 99 edits →Clarification?: Added a question regarding the use of past tense. ← Previous edit		Revision as of 03:12, 12 June 2014 edit undo Wthrower (talk \| contribs) 99 edits →Clarification?: Removed misplaced question. Next edit →
Line 37: So, do you guys know if XPS adds any value to the existing PDF standard, or XPS is just another monopolistic movement from Microsoft? If this is just a monopolistic movement from Microsoft it should be cited in the article. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/195.235.227.10\|195.235.227.10]] ([[User talk:195.235.227.10\|talk]]) 09:20, 15 July 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> Why is this format referred to in the past tense? I have not found any mention of the format's demise or abandonment in the article, so the past tense is confusing. [[User:Wthrower\|Wthrower]] ([[User talk:Wthrower\|talk]]) 03:11, 12 June 2014 (UTC) ==Conversations about Why==

Talk:Open XML Paper Specification: Difference between revisions