Nested case–control study: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 1:
A '''nested case control (NCC) study''' is a variation of a [[case-control study]] in which only a subset of controls from the cohort are compared to the incident cases. In a case-cohort study, all incident cases in the cohort are compared to a random subset of participants who do not develop the disease of interest. In contrast, in a nested-case-control study, some number of controls are selected for each case from that case's matched risk set. By matching on factors such as age and selecting controls from relevant risk sets, the nested case control model is generally more efficient than a case-cohort design with the same number of selected controls.
 
Usually, the exposure of interest is only measuredmeasur--[[Special:Contributions/203.241.147.40|203.241.147.40]] ([[User talk:203.241.147.40|talk]]) 08:27, 19 June 2014 (UTC)ed among the cases and the selected controls. Thus the nested case control study is less efficient than the full cohort design. The nested case control study can be analyzed using methods for missing covariates.<ref name=Cai/>
 
The NCC design is often used when the exposure of interest is difficult or expensive to obtain and when the outcome is rare. By utilizing data previously collected from a large cohort study, the time and cost of beginning a new case-control study is avoided. By only measuring the covariate in as many participants as necessary, the cost and effort of exposure assessment is reduced. This benefit is pronounced when the covariate of interest is biological, since assessments such as [[gene expression profiling]] are expensive, and because the quantity of blood available for such analysis is often limited, making it a valuable resource that should not be used unnecessarily.