Revision as of 19:55, 30 June 2006 edit Robertsteadman (talk \| contribs) 4,184 edits rv irrelevant additions to this debate. ← Previous edit		Revision as of 19:56, 30 June 2006 edit undo Robertsteadman (talk \| contribs) 4,184 edits →[[Anne Frank's cats]] Next edit →
Line 2: Consensus for article to be merged but main editor has renamed it instead. [[User:Neuropean\|Neuropean]] 19:41, 25 June 2006 (UTC) [[User:neuropean]]'s vote is not qualified: his first ever edit was [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anne_Frank%27s_cats&diff=prev&oldid=59841328 deletion notice] for this article. `'[[user:mikkalai\|mikka]] [[user talk:mikkalai\|(t)]] 15:55, 30 June 2006 (UTC) ::::Thank you - at last someone is seeing through what the nominatoir is up to. Misuse of WP to make a point. Not only shoudl his vote not count but the AfD should be thrown out. [[User:Robertsteadman\|Robertsteadman]] 19:56, 30 June 2006 (UTC) '''Strong Keep''' - it hasn't merely been merged it has been extended, other ediotors have added stuff and it is a worthwhile article with plenty of references to famous writings. This is a bad faith nomination by someone out to make a [[WP:POINT\|point]] and should simply get a '''speedy close'''. Please look at [[user: Neuropean]]'s contributions - a clear [[WP:SOCK\|sockpuppet]] out to cause trouble and, quite possibly, following a vendetta. Once you look at his/her contributions it is mpossible to assume good faith.[[User:Robertsteadman\|Robertsteadman]] 19:43, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anne Frank's cats: Difference between revisions