Revision as of 03:04, 24 July 2014 edit Anthonyhcole (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers 40,316 edits →Proposed changes: Comment. ← Previous edit		Revision as of 03:15, 24 July 2014 edit undo Anthonyhcole (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers 40,316 edits →Proposed changes: Comment. Next edit →
Line 114: I hope this is sufficient? [[User:AlexAtEbooks\|AlexAtEbooks]] ([[User talk:AlexAtEbooks\|talk]]) 11:24, 21 July 2014 (UTC) [[User:Philantrop\|Philantrop]], I think [[User:AlexAtEbooks\|Alex]] has established that their app is a thing, and belongs on this list. If you have any more problems with its inclusion, could you please let us know what they are? ~~Thanks~~An ~~for~~item ~~your~~doesn't ~~attention~~need to meet our [[WP:N\|article topic notability criteria]]. That notability guideline would apply if we were considering creating an article about their reader, but doesn't apply to mentioning it in an article. From the guideline's nutshell summary: "The notability guideline does not determine the content of articles, but only whether the topic should have its own article." --[[User:Anthonyhcole\|Anthonyhcole]] ([[User talk:Anthonyhcole\|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Anthonyhcole\|contribs]] · [[Special:EmailUser/Anthonyhcole\|email]]) 03:04, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Talk:Comparison of iOS e-reader software: Difference between revisions