Revision as of 14:43, 24 July 2014 edit Gadget850 (talk \| contribs) 115,579 edits →Is labeled section transclusion useful only when there are more than one labeled sections to transclude?: Sounds about right ← Previous edit		Revision as of 15:20, 24 July 2014 edit undo Gadget850 (talk \| contribs) 115,579 edits →Is labeled section transclusion useful only when there are more than one labeled sections to transclude?: Sounds about right- ce Next edit →
Line 12: [[mw:Extension:Labeled Section Transclusion]] says: "Its functionality is similar to an enhanced version of the <nowiki><onlyinclude></nowiki> tag with normal wiki transclusion, which selects sections for inclusion." It seems to me that <nowiki><onlyinclude></nowiki> is incompatible with labeled section transclusion, i.e., if you use one, you can't use the other. If there is only one section to be "onlyincluded", then using <nowiki><onlyinclude></nowiki> tags is sufficient for the purpose, and there is no benefit to converting those to a single labeled section. Only if one wants to have multiple labeled sections on the same page, does using labeled section transclusion become worthwhile. Is that correct? [[User:Wbm1058\|Wbm1058]] ([[User talk:Wbm1058\|talk]]) 12:25, 24 July 2014 (UTC) :Sounds about right. Never tested the interaction between {{~~xtag~~tag\|onlyinclude\|o}} and {{xtag\|section}} but I would not recommend mixing them. --<span style="color:Turquoise">'''''  [[User:Gadget850\|Gadget850]]'''''<sup>[[User talk:Gadget850\| ''talk'']]</sup></span> 14:43, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Help talk:Labeled section transclusion: Difference between revisions