Content deleted Content added
Anthonyhcole (talk | contribs) |
Philantrop (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 115:
[[User:Philantrop|Philantrop]], for inclusion in an article, a fact doesn't need to meet the criteria in [[WP:N|our notability guideline]]. That guideline would apply if they were considering creating an article about their reader, but doesn't apply when just mentioning it in an article. From the guideline's nutshell summary: "The notability guideline does not determine the content of articles, but only whether the topic should have its own article." To be mentioned in an article, a fact needs to be [[WP:V|verifiable]] and relevant. I think [[User:AlexAtEbooks|Alex]] has established that their app is a thing, and belongs on this list. If you have any more problems with its inclusion, could you please let us know what they are? --[[User:Anthonyhcole|Anthonyhcole]] ([[User talk:Anthonyhcole|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Anthonyhcole|contribs]] · [[Special:EmailUser/Anthonyhcole|email]]) 03:04, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
:Hello [[User:AlexAtEbooks|AlexAtEbooks]], [[User:Anthonyhcole|Anthonyhcole]], I'm not entirely comfortable with your argumentation and the extent of the coverage on "Ebook Reader". Nevertheless, what you presented is good enough, I'd say. [[User:Philantrop|Philantrop]] ([[User talk:Philantrop|talk]]) 13:06, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
| |||