Content deleted Content added
Victorianist (talk | contribs) |
→Notability again: Reply |
||
Line 315:
::: And for the record, I'm not opposed to changing what lists like this contain, but trash talk and personal attacks doesn't help make the case for change. [[User:Walter Görlitz|Walter Görlitz]] ([[User talk:Walter Görlitz|talk]]) 14:12, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
:::: Right, the policy you link to states the following: "External links or Internet directories. There is nothing wrong with adding one or more useful content-relevant links to an article; however, excessive lists can dwarf articles and detract from the purpose of Wikipedia. On articles about topics with many fansites, for example, including a link to one major fansite may be appropriate. See Wikipedia:External links for some guidelines." There is nothing excessive about linking to another tool that has the same stature and notability as some of the others here. I contend that the link I added to the table was "useful" and "content-relevant." There just aren't that many GUI testing tools in the world. There is no danger of it becoming a link farm. But you just go ahead and do what you like with the page. I'm done here. [[User:Victorianist|Victorianist]] ([[User talk:Victorianist|talk]]) 19:37, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
::::: The excessive nature is when every back-yard hobbyist adds their tool regardless of notability to the list despite them thinking it's useful or content-relevant. There are many GUI Testing tools in the world, I have seen the lists elsewhere. [[User:Walter Görlitz|Walter Görlitz]] ([[User talk:Walter Görlitz|talk]]) 04:03, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
| |||