Revision as of 05:25, 2 August 2014 edit Walter Görlitz (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 294,571 edits →Notability again: Reply ← Previous edit		Revision as of 05:33, 2 August 2014 edit undo Walter Görlitz (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 294,571 edits →Article nominated for deletion: Reply Next edit →
Line 323: This article has been nominated for deletion before, in 2007 and the consensus at that time was that it should be deleted. The "criteria" of notability proposed in the talk page and in hidden comments in the article itself is that that each link should point to an already existing article on Wikipedia, but this does not establish notability. The list contains red links and none of the listed items points to verifiable sources or to sources that establish notability. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Victorianist\|Victorianist]] ([[User talk:Victorianist\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Victorianist\|contribs]]) 04:30, 2 August 2014 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> : And the list was recreated in [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_GUI_testing_tools&oldid=185164952\|2008]. It currently only lists notable subjects despite your effort to turn it into a link farm and include other items. I really don't understand your logic. : Notability applies to subjects, I'm not sure it applies to lists. [[User:Walter Görlitz\|Walter Görlitz]] ([[User talk:Walter Görlitz\|talk]]) 05:33, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

Talk:Comparison of GUI testing tools: Difference between revisions