Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Object-oriented design ontology: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 04:56, 5 August 2014

Revision as of 04:56, 5 August 2014

Line 13:

<hr style="width:55%;" />

* '''Delete''' - 3 reference links are dead. 1 reference is very short, does not reference ontology and is a non-authoritative blog. 1 reference discusses object oriented design, but not ontology. 1 suggests that the practice of ontology arises from object oriented design but does not suggest that a specific OOD ontology exists. The last reference, A Theory of Object-Oriented Design, purports to "define an ontology that serves as a frame of reference for the discussion in the essential concepts of O-O design." However, it thereafter no longer discusses OOD ontology as a subject. The article may make an excellent proposal for a thesis, but I don't think it is appropriate as a Wikipedia article.--[[User:Rpclod|Rpclod]] ([[User talk:Rpclod|talk]]) 01:53, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

*'''DelegeDelete''' I too think the subject is insufficiently specifically notable, following the arguments just above.'''[[User:DGG| DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG| talk ]]) 04:56, 5 August 2014 (UTC)