Revision as of 15:05, 7 August 2014 edit Frietjes (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Template editors 1,038,579 edits m cleanup (wikitables, html markup, layout, etc.) ← Previous edit		Revision as of 15:05, 7 August 2014 edit undo Frietjes (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Template editors 1,038,579 edits →Group conclusion Next edit →
Line 200: == Group conclusion == [[File:Evaluating-communication.png\|thumb\|~~right~~upright\|A chart to evaluate four aspects of communication materials.]] When a group has completed their objectives, introspection and self-critique are necessary to provide growth from the collaborative work experience. This stage also can be used to identify further work to be performed. Documentation of previous group actions become particularly useful at this stage. Spence recommends<ref name="spencelecture" /> that to evaluate collaborative output, individuals must "attack projects, not people." Using the values and goals agreed upon in the 'setup' phase allows group members to make objective, authoritative critique of performance.

Collaborative method: Difference between revisions