Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Capability-based programming: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 11:34, 8 August 2014

Revision as of 11:35, 8 August 2014

Line 15:

*The methodology of using identified features (aka. Capabilities in this case) is becoming a common theme in device/service control applications, such as media & device control within the professional media industry, home automation, and the Internet of Things. For example, the Eclipse Smart Home Core project has/is adding similar concepts, calling the objects "Things" and the identified features "Channels", as has the FIMS 1.1 standard with the introduction of "Capabilities" to their Repository specification. In addition, products by vendors such as Fairlight also use these concepts within their product lines in order to allow clients to work with features, not objects. The methodology of implementing self-describing objects through the use of small, concise, uniquely identified features seems to be an emerging development pattern. Maybe this text is better served as part of the SMPTE ST2071 article until the methodology becomes more commonplace. Please advise. [[User:posicks|<font color="red">posicks</font>]] [[User talk:posicks|<font color="blue">talk to me</font>]] <small>19:53, 7 August 2014 (UTC)</small>

:Hi [[User:posicks|<font color="red">posicks</font>]]. This is a really filthy business, moving to delete the written word. I really don't want this article deleted (being an inclusionist and being a software dev with 25+ years in industry), but at the moment, there is a drive in WP in which articles need to be both verifiable and notable. Is there any development environment around the standard, any reference designs, any stuff say by a dev community of perhaps Microsoft Codeplex, GitHub, Google Groups or any dev site. Is there any reference samples, resource kits, other blog posts, comments in trade papers, whitepapers anything which can add some depth to the references. Had a look at the FIMS 1.1. It does seem to be an emerging standard, with a Youtube series on. It also seems to be fairly robust. I think it a merge into SMPTE ST2071 article is the best approach until it becomes best practice.

[[User:scope_creep|scope_creep]] [[User talk:scope_creep|talk]] 12:34 8 August 2014 (UTC)