Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Capability-based programming: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Capability-based programming: delete |
closing AfD as delete |
||
Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
<!--Template:Afd top
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
The result was '''delete'''. [[User:Deor|Deor]] ([[User talk:Deor|talk]]) 12:22, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
===[[Capability-based programming]]===
:{{la|Capability-based programming}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Capability-based programming|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 August 3#{{anchorencode:Capability-based programming}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Capability-based_programming Stats]</span>)
Line 19 ⟶ 25:
*'''Delete'''. Is it 'In world' or 'out world' - i forget. There is a particular WP term to describe jargon that is only of interest to people who are specialist in a given field. [[User:Szzuk|Szzuk]] ([[User talk:Szzuk|talk]]) 14:50, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
* '''Delete''' it is currently an unsupported (lacks adequate coverage) [[WP:Neologism]]/concept, maybe it is just [[WP:TOOSOON]] as [[User:scope creep|scope creep]] suggests, or maybe it is destined for the dustbin of history. --[[User:Bejnar|Bejnar]] ([[User talk:Bejnar|talk]]) 15:57, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>
|