Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Object-oriented SQL: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Object-oriented SQL: reply |
more |
||
Line 15:
*'''Keep''' [[WP:TNT]] is neither policy nor guideline. Deletion in such cases where improvement is required is done by means of ordinary editing per our [[WP:PRESERVE|editing policy]]. [[user:Andrew Davidson|Andrew]] ([[user talk:Andrew Davidson|talk]]) 16:19, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
:*Hi [[user:Andrew Davidson|Andrew Davidson]]. I'm pretty sure the [[User:Kephir|nom]] hadn't read [[WP:TNT]], as it has to do with ''rewriting'' articles, which s/he is not proposing. That being said, the article still has a [[WP:RS]] problem in that while several entities have been described as "objected-oriented SQL", I've not been able to find any sources that discuss "Object-oriented SQL" as such. If you're aware of any such [[WP:RS]] along those lines, I'd be happy to reconsider my !vote. [[User:Lesser Cartographies|Lesser Cartographies]] ([[User talk:Lesser Cartographies|talk]]) 17:59, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
::* The topic is a general concept rather than a specific implementation. There seem to be numerous sources which discuss various proposals and particular instances - see the books and scholar links above. I'm not seeing the problem. As for the nominator, they declare, "I am a deletionist ... I have little time for content improvements" and so presumably that's why they propose to destroy rather than improve this page. This is not our general [[WP:IMPERFECT|policy]] though. [[user:Andrew Davidson|Andrew]] ([[user talk:Andrew Davidson|talk]]) 18:04, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
| |||