Paraxial approximation: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
m split "raytracing" into "ray tracing" for consistency with conventional spelling and earlier link
No edit summary
Line 29:
{{cite web
| title=Paraxial approximation error plot
| url=[http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=Plot[%5B{%28x+Deg+-+Sin[x%5Bx+Deg]%5D%29%2FSin[x%5Bx+Deg]%5D%2C+%28Tan[x%5Bx+Deg]%5D+-+x+Deg%29%2FTan[x%5Bx+Deg]%5D%2C+%281+-+Cos[x%5Bx+Deg]%5D%29%2FCos[x+Deg]%2C%281-%28x5Bx+Deg%29^2%2F2-cos[x+Deg]%29%2FCos[x+Deg]5D}%2C+{x%2C+0%2C+15}%5D Plot]
| work=[[Wolfram Alpha]]
| publisher=[[Wolfram Research]]
| accessdate=1526 JanuaryAugust 2014}}</ref>
<!-- This plots the error plot of the paraxial approximation, i.e. the 3 curves for small angles: Plot[{(x Deg - Sin[x Deg])/Sin[x Deg], (Tan[x Deg] - x Deg)/Tan[x Deg], (1 - Cos[x Deg])/Cos[x Deg]}, {x, 0, 15}] -->
 
For larger angles it is often necessary to distinguish between [[meridional ray]]s, which lie in a plane containing the [[optical axis]], and [[sagittal ray]]s, which do not.