Ross, Scotland: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Tawkerbot2 (talk | contribs)
m BOT - rv 217.33.207.195 (talk) to last version by Laurel Bush
No edit summary
Line 15:
==History==
===Early history===
[[Ross Fuller]]The district of Ross is often mentioned in the [[Norse saga]]s along with the other parts of the country then governed by [[Mormaer]]s or Jarls, and [[Skene]] in his earlier work says that it was only on the downfall of those of [[Moray]] that the chiefs of Ross appear prominent in historical records, the [[Mormaer of Moray]] being in such close proximity to them and so great in power and influence that the less powerful Mormaer of Ross held only a comparatively subordinate position, and his name was in consequence seldom or never associated with any of the great events of that early period in Highland history. It was only after the disappearance of those district potentates that the chiefs appear under the appellation of [[Committee of Earls]]. That most, if not all, of these earls were the descendants of the ancient maormors there can be little doubt, and the natural presumption in this instance is strengthened by the fact that all the old authorities concur in asserting that the Gaelic name of the original Earls of Ross was O'Beolan - a corruption of Gilleoin, or Gillean, na h`Airde - or the descendants of Beolan. ''And we actually find,'' says the same authority, ''from the oldest Norse Saga connected with Scotland that a powerful chief in the North of Scotland named O'Beolan, married the daughter of Ganga Rolfe, or [[Rollo of Normandy]], the celebrated pirate who became afterwards the celebrated Earl of [[Normandy]].''
 
If this view is well-founded the ancestor of the Earls of Ross was chief in [[Kintail]] as early as the beginning of the tenth century. We have seen that the first Earl of Ross recorded in history was [[Malcolm MacHeth]], to whom a precept is found, directed by [[Malcolm IV]], requesting him to protect the monks of [[Dunfermline]] and defend them in their lawful privileges and possessions. The document is not dated, but judging from the names of the witnesses attesting it, the precept must have been issued before [[1162]]. It will be remembered that MacHeth was one of the six Celtic earls who besieged the King at [[Perth, Scotland|Perth]] two years before, in [[1160]]. [[William the Lion]], who seems to have kept the earldom in his own hands for several years, in [[1179]] marched into the district at the head of his earls and barons, accompanied by a large army, and subdued an insurrection fomented by the local chiefs against his authority. On this occasion he built two castles within its bounds, one called [[Dunscath]] on the northern [[Sutor]] at the entrance to the [[Cromarty Firth]], and [[Redcastle]] in the [[Black Isle]]. In the same year we find [[Floris III, Count of Holland]], complaining that he had been deprived of its nominal ownership by King William. There is no trace of any other earl in actual possession until we come to Ferquard or "Ferchair Mac an t' Sagairt," Farquhar the son of the Priest, who rose rapidly to power on the ruins of the once powerful MacHeth earls of Moray, of which line Kenneth MacHeth, who, with [[Donald Ban]], led a force into Moray against [[Alexander II of Scotland|Alexander II]], son of William the Lion, in [[1215]], was the last.