Revision as of 22:55, 31 August 2014 edit Rich Farmbrough (talk \| contribs) Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors 1,734,149 edits ←Created page with '==Notes== # Needs updating - the "0" page has 71 entries compared with 77 on Mathworld # I don't agree that every article should link back to Mathworld. WP has...'		Revision as of 22:56, 31 August 2014 edit undo Rich Farmbrough (talk \| contribs) Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors 1,734,149 edits →Notes Next edit →
Line 1: ==Notes== # Needs updating - the "0" page has 71 entries compared with 77 on Mathworld # I don't agree that every article should link back to Mathworld. WP has in many respects passed MW. If we already have good references and external links, then unless the MW article is special, there's no point adding the link. Compare, for example, [[Mathematical fallacy]] and [http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Fallacy.html Fallact at Mathworld]]. All the best: ''[[User:Rich Farmbrough\|Rich]] [[User talk:Rich Farmbrough\|Farmbrough]]'', <small>22:56, 31 August 2014 (UTC).</small><br />

Wikipedia talk:Coverage of Mathworld topics: Difference between revisions