Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Esoteric programming language related: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Line 57:
*'''Keep all'''. Some of these, such as [[Unlambda]], actually illustrate important computer science principles. Others, such as my favourite, [[HQ9 Plus]], parody various aspects of programming language design. And like others, I object to an entire category of topics being proposed for deletion: if there are individual entries that should be deleted, propose those on the merits of the case. The fact that such classics as [[Brainfuck]], [[Befunge]] and [[INTERCAL]] have been proposed suggests the proposer isn't taking due care and attention. —[[User:Ashley Y|Ashley Y]] 01:02, 2004 Sep 30 (UTC)
**Look again. I voted "Keep" for [[Brainfuck]], [[Befunge]] and [[INTERCAL]] (see [[Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Esoteric programming language related/Detail|Sub Page]]) -- [[User:Chris 73|Chris 73]] [[User talk:Chris 73|Talk]] 01:21, Sep 30, 2004 (UTC)
** Comment on the methods, not the man. I have no doubt that Chris's motives for this mass listing were nothing but the best. [[User:Benc|• Benc]][[User_talk:Benc| •]] 04:15, 30 Sep 2004 (UTC)
*Keep only the ones enumerated in [[Template:Esolangs]]; merge the rest into a single article. [[User:Poccil|[[User:Poccil|Peter O.]] ([[User Talk:Poccil|Talk]])]] 03:40, Sep 30, 2004 (UTC)
| |||