Revision as of 17:54, 21 June 2006 edit RckmRobot (talk \| contribs) 46 edits →QFT? ← Previous edit		Revision as of 04:07, 7 July 2006 edit undo Lotte Monz (talk \| contribs) 84 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 64: --[[User:RckmRobot\|RckmRobot]] 14:48, 16 June 2006 (UTC) *After looking into this, I found out that it ''is'' in fact the inverse QFT rather than the "normal" QFT that is used in implementing Shor's Algorithm. I fixed the article accordingly.--[[User:RckmRobot\|RckmRobot]] 17:54, 21 June 2006 (UTC) ==Implementation== There are many who don't accept the factorization of 15 as a valid "true quantum" implementation. Would an expert like to comment on why no one has gone beyond 15 in hardware implementations in the last 5 years? [[User:Lotte Monz\|Lotte Monz]] 04:07, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Talk:Shor's algorithm: Difference between revisions