Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Esoteric programming language related: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m tone my vote down a bit. |
|||
Line 63:
*'''Keep'''. I think keep it if there is one mention on 1 google about the language and its not a wikipedia article copy, keep the language, also keep it if any other langugages or theorys are based off of it. [[User:Patcat88|Patcat88]] 05:57, 30 Sep 2004 (UTC)
*'''''Keep all'''''. This Vfd listing is just wrong, just like listing the GNAA three times. Google hits are NOT a valid reason to delete. Wikipedia is not paper, I have gone through every listing and each of the languages are real. This will hurt Wikipedia by creating holes in Wikipedias coverage. Esotoric languages are crazy, but it provides entertainment for some, so keep them all. [[User:Norm|Nor<sup>[[user_talk:Norm|m]]]] 09:57, 30 Sep 2004 (UTC)
*'''''Keep all'''''. No need to delete knowledge. [[User:WhiteTimberwolf|WhiteTimberwolf]] 11:50, 30 Sep 2004 (UTC)
| |||