Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Esoteric programming language related: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Line 65:
*'''''Keep all'''''. No need to delete knowledge. [[User:WhiteTimberwolf|WhiteTimberwolf]] 11:50, 30 Sep 2004 (UTC)
*'''''Comment''''': the google test mechanism employed to discredit the languages described in the articles seems fatally flawed. Almost invariably the test has been to search for "''name'' programming language". I wonder if this is likely to discount perfectly good hits simply on the grounds that this exact phrase does not occur. I might support replacing the '''''List''''' with a longer article containing more detailed descriptions of each language, but I suspect that the product would be less helpful than what we have now. I'm definitely inclining towards ''Keep'' unless I can be convinced otherwise. --[[User:Phil Boswell|Phil]] | [[User talk:Phil Boswell|Talk]] 12:05, Sep 30, 2004 (UTC)
*'''Keep All''' ''esoteric'' does not mean ''unknown''. There is a great deal of interest in these languages among CS people. The Google results are flawed and so meaningless. Too much attention is paid to them anyway. Also, the nominator voted Keep for some entries, undercutting his own argument [[User:Thesteve|<font color=#FFFFFF>The Steve</font>]] 13:07, Sep 30, 2004 (UTC)
| |||