Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Esoteric programming language related: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Triskaideka (talk | contribs) comment: VALGOL works |
→Esoteric programming language related: reply to Factitious |
||
Line 72:
**If someone were to write a working compiler for [[SIMPLE programming language|SIMPLE]], would you change your mind about its status? [[User:Factitious|Factitious]] 20:34, Sep 30, 2004 (UTC)
***Someone did write a working (at least, I assume it works) implementation of [[VALGOL programming language|VALGOL]]; see [http://catseye.mine.nu:8080/projects/valgol/]. [[User:Triskaideka|<nowiki></nowiki>]]—[[User:Triskaideka|Triskaideka]] 21:21, 30 Sep 2004 (UTC)
****Yeah, and there's also an attempt to define the specs for [[Sartre programming language|SARTRE]] too... So I don't know. They can't be as wild as the original article in InfoWorld specified so in that matter their implementations are different from the actual joke. Maybe [[fictional programming languages]] could also hold those languages that started as a joke? The working ones could also be listed in the [[list of esoteric programming languages]]. The simplest solution would of course be to left everything as it currently is. :) --[[User:ZeroOne|ZeroOne]] 21:29, 30 Sep 2004 (UTC)
*'''Keep all'''. And don't list 74 articles at once. [[User:Eric119|Eric119]] 20:39, 30 Sep 2004 (UTC)
*'''Keep all''' because I object to this mass-nomination. [[User:Gwalla|<nowiki></nowiki>]] — [[User:Gwalla|Gwalla]] | [[User talk:Gwalla|Talk]] 20:48, 30 Sep 2004 (UTC)
| |||