Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 24:
* The pbdR built on pbdMPI uses [[SPMD|SPMD parallelism]] where every processors are considered as workers and own parts of data. The [[SPMD|SPMD parallelism]] introduced in mid 1980 is particularly efficient in homogeneous computing environments for large data, for example, performing [[singular value decomposition]] on a large matrix, or performing [[Mixture model|clustering analysis]] on high-dimensional large data. On the other hand, there is no restriction to use [[Master/slave (technology)|manager/workers parallelism]] in [[SPMD|SPMD parallelism]] environment.
* The Rmpi<ref name=rmpi/> uses [[Master/slave (technology)|manager/workers parallelism]] where one main processor (manager) servers as the control of all other processors (workers). The [[Master/slave (technology)|manager/workers parallelism]] introduced around early 2000 is particularly efficient for large tasks in small [[Computer cluster|clusters]], for example, [[Bootstrapping (statistics)|bootstrap method]] and [[Monte Carlo method|Monte Carlo simulation]] in applied statistics since [[Independent and identically distributed random variables|i.i.d.]] assumption is commonly used in most [[Statistics|statistical analysis]]. In particular, task pull parallelism has better performance for Rmpi in heterogeneous computing environments.
The idea of [[SPMD|SPMD parallelism]] is to let every processor do the same amount of work, but on different parts of a large data set. For example, a modern [[Graphics processing unit|GPU]] is a large collection of slower co-processors that can simply apply the same computation on different parts of relatively smaller data, but the SPMD parallelism ends up with an efficient way to obtain final solutions (i.e. time to solution is shorter).<ref>{{cite web | url = http://graphics.stanford.edu/~mhouston/ | title = Folding@Home - GPGPU | author = Mike Houston | accessdate = 2007-10-04 }}</ref> It is clear that pbdR is not only suitable for small [[Computer cluster|clusters]], but is also more stable for analyzing [[Big data]] and more scalable for [[supercomputer]]s.<ref>{{cite journal|author=Schmidt, D., Ostrouchov, G., Chen, W.-C., and Patel, P.|title=Tight Coupling of R and Distributed Linear Algebra for High-Level Programming with Big Data|year=2012|pages=811–815|journal=High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis (SCC), 2012 SC Companion:|url=http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2477156}}</ref> In short, pbdR
* does '''not''' like Rmpi, snow, snowfall, do-like, '''nor''' parallel packages in R,
* does '''not''' focus on interactive computing '''nor''' master/workers,
| |||