Definite quadratic form: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
unstub
Line 23:
==References==
{{reflist}}
* Nathanael Leedom Ackerman (2006) [http://math.berkeley.edu/~nate/teaching/UPenn/2006/fall/math_371/lectures/week_3/lecture_4/lecture_4.pdf Lecture notes Math 371],{{dead link}} Positive definite bilinear form is definition 0.5.0.7, weblink from [[University of California, Berkeley]].
* {{cite book | last=Kitaoka | first=Yoshiyuki | title=Arithmetic of quadratic forms | series=Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics | volume=106 | publisher=Cambridge University Press | year=1993 | isbn=0-521-40475-4 | zbl=0785.11021 }}
* {{Lang Algebra | edition=3r2004|page=578}}