Content deleted Content added
Line 3:
A UK High Court judgement ruled that the technique, which requires the player to trick the croupier into rotating cards, is cheating in civil law, and that a casino was justified in refusing payment of winnings; this ruling would not be applicable if the player simply took advantage of an observed error or anomaly for which he was not responsible in, say, the backs of the cards.
==Legality==
Casinos usually regard this technique as cheating; many players consider that they are legitimately playing to gain an advantage.
| |||