Talk:In-memory processing: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by 72.93.83.117 - "Merger proposal: "
Line 10:
::As it stands, this article can't stay on Wikipedia anyway; it's written like an essay trying to sell you some products, not an informative encyclopedia article. I don't know if there is anything salvageable here, but merging it into another article is one way. Deleting is another way. -- [[user:intgr|intgr]]&nbsp;<small>[[user talk:intgr|[talk]]]</small> 14:56, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
 
This topic is increasingly important because most modern RDBMS support in-memory database functions and users need to understand when and how to use and tune these features. In-memory databases are distinct from in-memory processing by being transactional, by being durable (through durable transaction logs), and by supporting the usual DBMS features such as query languages. Falling DRAM prices have driven major improvements in the cost-effectiveness of in-memory database technologies, and they are now commonly mainstream. MySQL and Oracle have long supported this, and with the 2014 release Microsoft SQL Server also supports it. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/72.93.83.117|72.93.83.117]] ([[User talk:72.93.83.117|talk]]) 14:48, 2 November 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->