Content deleted Content added
m moved Talk:Java platform to Talk:Java Platform: The following statement could be found in the article. The platform is properly called the Java Platform |
Moved comment from main page to talk |
||
Line 19:
'''Removed merge suggestion''' Since this generated almost no discussion in about a month, I removed the merge request, for now. – [[User:Doug Bell|Doug Bell]] <sup>[[User talk:Doug Bell|talk]]'''•'''[[Special:Contributions/Doug Bell|contrib]]</sup> 10:01, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
== Comment from Anonymous User ==
An anonymous user (68.44.67.224) added the following material to the main page, which I've moved to here:
Author seems a bit biased. "copied from Java" is heavey to use - in fact -
in many cases it can be safely assumed the other way. Runtime is not a new
concept, OOP is not an innovation Java either - generics, indexers etc are
not started in Java first. concept of packages (or namespaces) was also not
new - neither exceptions nor interfaces. Even MVC is not from Java alone.
If any one worked for long enough time in both Java and C++/VC++/VB worlds
or in other languages such as SmallTalk and ADA - they can easily ruleout
this innovation concept in Java. I am not stating that Java is not
innovative but every language / platform started and improved as a part of
evolution. In fact most of the .NET ideas are now being incorporated in
Tiger and Mustang. It is always give and take. Please note that C++, VC++,
VB and SMALLTALK are long enough in the industry to mature and also much
older than Java. Applets may the innovation but again as I mentioned - all
languages are evolutionary in nature
| |||