Revision as of 15:09, 12 November 2014 edit Paddy3118 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 843 edits →C has first-class functions (revisited): Blocks and functions? ← Previous edit		Revision as of 21:45, 16 November 2014 edit undo Paddy3118 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 843 edits →Section "Case study: function composition" is not worth having. Next edit →
Line 431: :If this version of C has functions as well as blocks then no, the article is not in error - it is not called first class blocks. These versions of C would have blocks distinct from functions and so it would be correct to omit them. --[[User:Paddy3118\|Paddy]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118\|talk]]) 15:09, 12 November 2014 (UTC) == Section "Case study: function composition" is not worth having. == This language specific section does not have enough merit to be included as it only states the capabilities and limitations of one language and will only encourage a host of other language specific entries. It is better to delete it. --[[User:Paddy3118\|Paddy]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118\|talk]]) 21:45, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Talk:First-class function: Difference between revisions