Content deleted Content added
Criticism |
|||
Line 115:
I am not a Christian Scientist and never have been one but find them an interesting group. I simply want this article to remain accurate and unbiased.--[[User:JeffLB|JeffLB]] 14:41, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
Hello :-) you got my gender right, anyway! The links are not an attack on the Bible but on the doctrines of biblical literalism and inerrancy. Christian Scientists are not biblical literalists or inerrantists and neither was Mary Baker Eddy, as outlined in the article. The material the links refer to is in fact supportive of the Christian Science position on the Bible(though that may not have been the original intention of the authors). AUSCS supports the separation of church and state--so do most Christian Scientists. The Christian Science Church, as far as I know, supports AUSCS (or did so in the past, at any rate). Compare the health of Christianity in the US which has such a separation between church and state, with the dire situation in the UK which has an established church. I appreciate your desire to keep the article accurate and unbiased, but please don't jump to conclusions :-) I have been a Christian Scientist for many years. BTW, if you keep reverting the article, you are causing a mistake to reappear in the Tenets of Christian Science (omission of the first one). I will get a Wikipedia ID as soon as I can get around to it. Regards [[User:81.108.30.88|81.108.30.88]] 20:30, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
== Christian Science and Medicine ==
| |||