Revision as of 05:13, 11 September 2014 edit SURIV (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers 1,312 edits m →Later decisions: Fixing style/layout errors ← Previous edit		Revision as of 17:05, 2 December 2014 edit undo Trappist the monk (talk \| contribs) Administrators 494,558 edits m →References: Remove redundant \|year= parameter from CS1 citations; using AWB Next edit →
Line 128: {{cite journal \|ref=harv \|url=http://jolt.law.harvard.edu/articles/pdf/v10/10HarvJLTech239.pdf \|journal=Harvard Journal of Law & Technology \|volume=10 \|issue=2 \|date=Winter 1997 ~~\|year =1997~~ \|title=COMPUTER SCIENCE CONCEPTS IN COPYRIGHT CASES: THE PATH TO A COHERENT LAW \|first1=Marci A. \|last1=Hamilton \|first2=Ted \|last2=Sabety Line 138: {{cite journal \|ref=harv \|url=http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2911&context=flr \|journal=Fordham Law Review \|volume=59 \|issue=4 \|date=January 1, 1991 ~~\|year=1991~~ \|title=Copyright Protection of SSO: Replete with Internal Deficiencies and Practical Dangers \|first=Cary S. \|last=Kappel Line 164: \|url=http://www.lexisnexis.com/community/litigationresourcecenter/blogs/litigationblog/archive/2012/05/07/jury-says-google-infringed-but-it-can-t-agree-on-fair-use.aspx \|work=LexisNexis \|date=May 7, 2012 ~~\|year=2012~~ \|title=Jury Says Google Infringed, But It Can't Agree On Fair Use \|first=Melissa \|last=Ritti

Structure, sequence and organization: Difference between revisions